The Fry Side

The Life and Times and Inane Thoughts of Evan Fryer

Let’s Go Nuclear, But Start Small

with 5 comments

Here is a grand idea from Professor Bainbridge about how to get nuclear power going again in the US.

The Navy already operates dozens of small nuclear reactors in aircraft carriers and submarines, with an outstanding record of safety and reliability. They have an established training program that churns out nuclear-capable officers.

By analogy to the Army Corps of Engineering, we could create a Navy Corps of Nuclear Engineering. It would build and operate dozens of small nuclear power plants around the country.

To address security concerns, the first plants would be built on military bases, where the garrison can provide security. Licensing costs would be cut because the government would own and operate the plants.

The proposal should not offend small government sensibilities. Nuclear power is rife with market failures (and government failures). Huge research and development costs associated with traditional large scale nuclear power plants may be beyond the ability of private firms to finance. In addition, we know that private firms tend to underproduce the sort of basic R&D necessary to develop new generations of power plants. But the Navy already spends money to develop new naval reactors, which presumably could be scaled up at reasonable costs. Since the Navy need not worry about earning market competitive rates of return on its investment in R&D, moreover, there’s no economic disincentive to conducting that sort of R&D in the Navy.

(Found via The Daily Dish | By Andrew Sullivan.)

I thought this was great. Small power plants at military sites means the technology gets used, they don’t use fossil fuels, our defense not only stays off the grid but can now offset some costs by selling leftover power to the grid.

Now all we have to do is upgrade the damn grid.

Written by Fry

February 3rd, 2010 at 9:38 am

5 Responses to 'Let’s Go Nuclear, But Start Small'

Subscribe to comments with RSS or TrackBack to 'Let’s Go Nuclear, But Start Small'.

  1. I don’t agree with this idea. While nuclear power does not produce fossil fuels, it does produce large amounts of nuclear waste, waste that ends up getting buried in the Nevada desert.

    Solar power is something we should have had 30 years ago. The only problem with it right now is that it isn’t feasible for the average family to do, the cost is still too high, even with a government tax credit.

    Warren

    3 Feb 10 at 3:34 pm

  2. The French and Japanese get around the waste buildup by reprocessing the remaining usable fuel in the spent fuel rods and burning the Plutonium byproduct in special reactors. Congress and the environmentalists refuses to allow such sane waste reduction practices in the US.

    Dad

    3 Feb 10 at 11:42 pm

  3. I did not know that!

    What is the reasoning in the US for not burning the byproduct?

    Warren

    4 Feb 10 at 2:13 pm

  4. The US doing the dirty work? What??

    Just ship nuclear waste to France. Name a Republican who’d be against that!

    Seriously though, I was going to look up what the Navy exactly does with the waste they generate on a sub or carrier.

    Fry

    4 Feb 10 at 2:42 pm

  5. Why – The environmental movement hysteria has maintained such a death grip on the permit process since 3 Mile Island that the US has lost an entire generation of scientists and technocrats needed to operate the facilities.

    Dad

    6 Feb 10 at 10:11 pm

Leave a Reply