Reading Lots
I’ve been reading a lot more. I knocked out Prisoner of Azkaban in just about a week. This week I read Sun Tzu’s The Art of War. Now I’m back onto Machiavelli after taking a break from it to read a couple of novels (and to catch up with my niece who is reading the Harry Potter series for the first time).
The speed reading is definitely coming along, I think. My retention is higher. I’m getting closer to my goal of reading about a book a week, plus I’m able to consume more delicious content online. Hopefully that’ll make up for the fact I can’t listen to podcasts any longer since my kids keep getting louder.
So here are a few lines from The Art of War that struck me. From Chapter 2, Waging War:
3. If the campaign is protracted, the resources of the State will not be equal to the strain.
6. There is no instance of a country having benefited from prolonged warfare.
Chapter 3, Attack by Strategem:
18. If you know the enemy and know yourself, you need not fear the outcome of a hundred battles. If you know yourself but not the enemy, for every victory gained you will also suffer a defeat. If you know neither the enemy nor yourself, you will succumb in every battle.
Chapter 13, The Use of Spies:
4. What enables the wise sovereign and the good general to strike and conquer, and achieve things beyond the reach of ordinary men, is foreknowledge.
5. Now, this foreknowledge cannot be elicited from spirits; it cannot be obtained inductively from experience, nor by any deductive calculation.
5.1 If it weren’t for my horse, I wouldn’t have spent that year in college.*
6. Knowledge of the enemy’s dispositions can only be obtained from other men.
27. Hence it is only the enlightened ruler and the wise general who will use the highest intelligence of the army for the purposes of spying and thereby they achieve great results. Spies are the most important element of warfare, because on them depends an army’s ability to move.
That all spoke quite a bit about what has happened in the world in the past decade, and even so about the Cold War as well. Who would have thought that actual, evidential knowledge would be useful in conducting war?
*Not actual quote from Sun Tzu.
I wondered if you might get around to Sun Tzu – plus Machiavelli. Are you plotting something?
Dad
3 Feb 10 at 12:20 am
I have some Orwell next up in the docket. Are you getting a little scared yet?
I picked up a nice copy of Sun Tzu a while back and finally got around to reading it. I’ve read Machiavelli before, but I thought it’d be fun to see how the ways of war had changed over 2000 years between the two authors. Turns out, not much.
Fry
3 Feb 10 at 9:13 am